traditional chinese wedding dress 'Qionghua'Orange Cheongsam Trailing Bridal Wedding Dress Chinese Wedding Dress
SKU: 38707223359
traditional chinese wedding dress

traditional chinese wedding dress 'Qionghua'Orange Cheongsam Trailing Bridal Wedding Dress Chinese Wedding Dress

Sale price$18.51 Regular price$20.57
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $5.14 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 29 - Jul 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

traditional chinese wedding dress 'Qionghua'Orange Cheongsam Trailing Bridal Wedding Dress Chinese Wedding DressCheongsam Xiuhe Orange Trailing Bridal Wedding Dress & Mens Dragon Suit S2XL An exquisite orange trailing cheongsam Xiuhe bridal gown with a dramatic waist trailing silhouette, crafted from premium jacquard brocade () with 5D structured tailoring. Available as womens Qionghua gown or mens Dragon pattern suit. Please refer to the detailed size charts below before ordering. All measurements are taken flat by hand a variance of 13 cm is normal.

Cheongsam Xiuhe — Orange Trailing Bridal Wedding Dress & Men’s Dragon Suit | S–2XL

An exquisite orange trailing cheongsam Xiuhe bridal gown with a dramatic waist-trailing silhouette, crafted from premium jacquard brocade (织锦缎面) with 5D structured tailoring. Available as women’s Qionghua gown or men’s Dragon pattern suit. Please refer to the detailed size charts below before ordering. All measurements are taken flat by hand — a variance of 1–3 cm is normal.

  • Measurement variance: All measurements are taken flat by hand. A variance of 1–3 cm is normal — please use the physical item received as the final reference.
  • Height note: For heights 150–162 cm / 4’11"–5’4", high heels are recommended. For heights around 170 cm / 5’7", flat shoes are recommended.
  • Sizing: Select based on your bust/chest measurement as the primary guide, cross-referencing with the recommended weight.
  • Colour note: Actual colour may differ slightly from images due to screen settings and photography lighting.

✦ Size Guide — Women’s 

All measurements in cm. 1 inch = 2.54 cm | 1 foot = 30.48 cm | 1 kg = 2.205 lbs. Variance of 1–3 cm is normal.

Size Bust (cm / in) Waist (cm / in) Rec. Weight (jin / kg / lbs)
S 84 / 33.1" 74 / 29.1" 90 jin / 45 kg / 99 lbs
M 88 / 34.6" 78 / 30.7" 100 jin / 50 kg / 110 lbs
L 92 / 36.2" 82 / 32.3" 110 jin / 55 kg / 121 lbs
XL 96 / 37.8" 86 / 33.9" 120 jin / 60 kg / 132 lbs
2XL 100 / 39.4" 90 / 35.4" 130 jin / 65 kg / 143 lbs

✦ Size Guide — Men’s 

Size Chest (cm / in) Waist (cm / in) Rec. Weight (jin / kg / lbs)
S 100 / 39.4" 100 / 39.4" 115–135 jin / 58–68 kg / 127–149 lbs
M 108 / 42.5" 108 / 42.5" 135–155 jin / 68–78 kg / 149–171 lbs
L 116 / 45.7" 116 / 45.7" 155–175 jin / 78–88 kg / 171–193 lbs
XL 124 / 48.8" 124 / 48.8" 175–195 jin / 88–98 kg / 193–215 lbs
2XL 132 / 52.0" 132 / 52.0" 195–220 jin / 98–110 kg / 215–242 lbs

✦ International Size Conversion — Women’s

Approximate equivalents based on bust measurement. Always refer to garment measurements as the primary guide.

This Listing CN US UK EU AU JP
S S/160 2–4 6–8 34–36 6–8 7–9
M M/165 6–8 10–12 38–40 10–12 11–13
L L/170 10–12 14–16 42–44 14–16 15–17
XL XL/175 14–16 18–20 46–48 18–20 19–21
2XL 2XL/175 18–20 22–24 50–52 22–24 23–25

✦ International Size Conversion — Men’s

This Listing CN US UK EU AU JP
S S/165 XS–S XS–S 44–46 XS–S S
M M/170 S–M S–M 48–50 S–M M
L L/175 M–L M–L 52–54 M–L L
XL XL/180 L–XL L–XL 56–58 L–XL XL
2XL 2XL/185 XL–2XL XL–2XL 60–62 XL–2XL 2XL

Conversions are approximate. Always refer to garment measurements as the primary guide.

Sizing Tips

  • Women: Select size based on your bust measurement as the primary guide.
  • Men: Select size based on your chest measurement as the primary guide.
  • If between sizes, size up for a more comfortable fit.
  • Height tip: Heights 150–162 cm (4’11"–5’4") — pair with high heels. Heights ~170 cm (5’7") — flat shoes recommended.
  • A variance of 1–3 cm is normal for all measurements.
  • Contact us for personalised sizing advice.

✦ Product Highlights

  • Orange trailing cheongsam Xiuhe bridal gown — dramatic waist-trailing silhouette with auspicious cloud brocade hem (祥云织锦拖尾裙摆)
  • 5D structured tailoring — body-sculpting cut that slims and flatters (修身显瘦气场加持)
  • Premium jacquard brocade fabric — lightweight yet luxurious; reduces the heavy feel of traditional bridal wear
  • Classic stand collar  · Elegant cuffs · Brocade satin surface
  • Golden ratio design concept — flatters the figure with refined detail craftsmanship
  • Available in S–2XL for both women’s and men’s — inclusive sizing
  • Perfect for Chinese weddings, toasting ceremonies, photography, cultural events, and stage performances

✦ Style Guide

The Cheongsam Xiuhe orange trailing bridal gown embodies the grandeur and elegance of traditional Chinese wedding culture. The rich orange brocade — a colour of joy, prosperity, and celebration — is elevated by the dramatic trailing hem and 5D structured silhouette. Pair with the matching Dragon pattern men’s suit for a coordinated couple look. Style with phoenix hair ornaments, jade jewellery, and embroidered shoes for a complete, editorial-worthy bridal ensemble — ideal for Chinese weddings, toasting ceremonies, and photography.

Care Instructions

  • Dry clean or gentle hand wash only — handle with care to preserve the brocade fabric and trailing hem
  • Wash separately — do not mix wash
  • Do not machine wash, bleach, or soak
  • Do not wring — handle gently to preserve fabric structure
  • Hang dry naturally — avoid direct sunlight to prevent colour fading
  • Store hanging in a breathable garment bag; keep away from direct light and moisture
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 38707223359

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell traditional chinese wedding dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 2030 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
G
Verified Purchase
Greg Taylor
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Why aren't people reading this and discussing it?
Format: Paperback
This book should be read by everybody on any side of the current debate as to what are future Iraq (Iran?, N. Korea?- w/ the current set of maroons you never know) policy should be. Ikle was Undersecretary of Defense for the Reagan administration. He is one of the original neocons. This book had an enormous influence on how Bush I and Powell decided to end our first Gulf War. He revised this book in 1991 and revised it again and wrote a new intro in 2005. My point is that this man is no cut and run liberal (and I should admit that, right now, I am leaning toward just that position). However, what makes Ikle stand out from his demented neocon brethren is that he is willing to face up to ALL of the possibilities, the difficulties and the ambiguities that are inherent in any foreign policy, let alone a war. He mentions many of the wars and theatres of those wars in the twentiety century and points out how many times politicians and generals went wrong because they would not 1. clearly set out the goals they were trying to accomplish in a war and 2. constantly reevaluate those goals in light of the developing situation. Ikle outlines a few of the difficulties that are obstacles to such a course. Rather prophetically, he talks about how difficult it is to get good intelligence to base your policies on. Sources from within the country of your opponent may mislead you for their own purposes. Agencies within your own government are posturing with the intelligence to protect their influence. Does any of this sound familiar? In one of my favorite chapters of this book, Ikle talks about a tendency that occurs when things start to get difficult in a war. Those who are supporters of the war will start posturing as patriots and referring to the opponents of the war as traitors (or, in the parlance of the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, as "surrender monkeys"). Again does this sound at all familiar? Here is another one for ya. Ilke argues that it is essential to know why exactly you are fighting. Otherwise, you will never really know when you have won. It is very clear that the whole WMD was just what Rumsfeld or Cheney (I have forgotten which- neither one of them has said anything about the war that is worth remembering in a positive sense) said it was-the one justification they "could all agree on." The role of America as the Great Democratizer has faded into memory. Now we are left with The MisDecider telling us that it is all about leaving Iraq with "a viable government" What does that mean? How is that different from what they had under Sadam? Here is my main point. Here is what makes me so angry. Powell, Rumsfeld, and Cheney all read this book back before the first Gulf War. Nothing has changed in the world to make the recommendations of this book any less vital. These men and women were supposed to be the most experienced foreign and military people the Republicans had produced (which should blow all claims to the Republicans being the party of security out of the water). They ignored these lessons because they choose to and went ahead and made what may be the most serious strategic error since Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. I am hopeful that the Dems now have more power but only slightly so. We need to have a serious discussion now. Not posturing. It may be that we should simply leave at this point because the decline of Iraq into chaos is inevitable. But as someone who is an internationalist, I think we need to look long and hard at the results of doing that before we simply do so. We owe it to the people of Iraq and the surrounding area to do whatever we can to minimize their suffering, to restore a working infrastructure and government to their country and to restore peace to their daily lives. Facing up and discussing the issues as suggested by Ilke is our duty as a democratic polity. There are no easy answers here except for the obvious fact that we cannot rely on Bush and his minions to do what needs to be done. Give this book a read. It is not gracefully written but it is short and direct. You may find it one of the strangest ironies of our time that one of the most telling critiques of the administration comes from someone who is their ally. The main difference between Ikle and people like Bush is that Ikle takes the world more seriously than his ideology.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2007
J
Verified Purchase
James 634685
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Good book. Insightful but an easy read
Format: Paperback
Good material in international relations.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2024
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 4
This book is great to share with friends and an excellent conversation starter ...
Format: Paperback
A quick but thoughtful read. This book is great to share with friends and an excellent conversation starter without being exactly political, in the negative sense of the word. Inspires constructive conversation regardless of your background.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2017
C
Verified Purchase
CG
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Best book on the subject
Format: Paperback
Short yet concise argument for ending wars.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2022
H
Verified Purchase
harel charnis
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
A must learn
Format: Paperback
Too important to be forgitten
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2019

recommand products