dress blue charlies usmc Original U.S. WWII USAAF Pilot Type C-1 Emergency Sustenance Vest –  International Military Antiques
SKU: 32130233881
dress blue charlies usmc

dress blue charlies usmc Original U.S. WWII USAAF Pilot Type C-1 Emergency Sustenance Vest – International Military Antiques

Sale price$25.94 Regular price$28.82
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $7.21 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 30 - Jul 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

dress blue charlies usmc Original U.S. WWII USAAF Pilot Type C-1 Emergency Sustenance Vest – International Military AntiquesOriginal Item. Only One Available. This is a lovely unnamed Marine Corps dress uniform set to a twice wounded Pacific veteran. The group includes the jacket, trousers, and belt. The jacket bears Corporal chevrons on both sleeves, a 3rd Marine Division patch on the left shoulder, and EGA Collar insignia with one 3rd Marine Division pin on the collar. There is a ladder qualification bar with bars for Sharpshooter, Pistol, and Sub Machine. There is a 5

Original Item. Only One Available. This is a lovely unnamed Marine Corps dress uniform set to a twice-wounded Pacific veteran. The group includes the jacket, trousers, and belt.

The jacket bears Corporal chevrons on both sleeves, a 3rd Marine Division patch on the left shoulder, and EGA Collar insignia with one 3rd Marine Division pin on the collar. There is a ladder qualification bar with bars for Sharpshooter, Pistol, and Sub Machine. There is a 5-place ribbon bar with the Purple Heart with star, the Navy Unit Commendation, the Navy Presidential Unit Citation, the Asiatic Campaign medal with 3 campaign stars, and the WWII Victory Medal. There is no name inside, but there is a maker tag for Bestbilt uniforms of NY.

The trousers are in similar condition and are matching. The white belt is in good shape with a gilt buckle.
 
A great uniform set, ready for further research and display.

World War II 3rd Marine Division:
The 3rd Marine Division was officially activated on 16 September 1942 at Camp Elliott, San Diego, California. Most of the original members

of the division were drawn from the cadre staff of the 2nd Marine Division. The division was initially built around the 9th Marine Regiment, commanded by Colonel Lemuel C. Shepherd, Jr. who later became the 20th Commandant of the Marine Corps. Major General Charles D. Barrett was the first commanding general of the division.

The division deployed into Auckland, New Zealand, between January and March 1943. In June of that year, it moved onto Guadalcanal for additional training. 1 November 1943 saw the division land as part of the Battle of Bougainville and fight on the island until their last unit to arrive, the 21st Marine Regiment, embarked on 9 January 1944. During the course of the battle the division had about 400 Marines killed.

The division returned to Guadalcanal in January 1944 to rest, refit, and retrain. The next operation in which the division took part was the Battle of Guam. From 21 July 1944 until the last day of organized fighting on 10 August, the division fought through the jungles on the island of Guam. During these 21 days of fighting, the division captured over 60 square miles (160 km2) of territory and killed over 5,000 enemy soldiers. The next two months saw continuous mopping up operations in which the Marines continued to engage leftover Japanese forces. At the end of the battle the division had sustained 677 Marines killed, 3,626 wounded, and nine missing.

The division remained on the island of Guam for training, until it embarked as part of the landing force for the Battle of Iwo Jima. The 3rd Marine Division was initially in reserve for the battle.[6] However, the division was committed one regiment at a time when the initial regiments that landed there needed to be relieved.

The 21st Marines came ashore on 20 February followed by the 9th Marines, and then were reinforced by a battalion from the 3rd Marines on 25 February. The Marines of these two infantry regiments, supported by the artillery of the 12th Marine Regiment and tanks of the 3rd Tank Battalion, fought on Iwo Jima until the end of organized resistance on 16 March and the subsequent mopping up operations for the next month. All elements of the division were back on Guam by 17 April 1945. The fighting on Iwo Jima cost the 3rd Marine Division 1,131 killed in action and another 4,438 wounded.

After the return to Guam, the division began preparing for the invasion of Japan. This invasion never took place since Japan surrendered on 14 August 1945. The 3rd Marine Division was deactivated on 28 December 1945.

During the war, the 3rd Marine Division had three Seabee Battalions assigned to it. The 25th Naval Construction Battalion (NCB) was posted to 19th Marines as the third battalion of the regiment. These landed on Bougainville, as did the 71st NCB which was assigned as the 3rd Division's shore party there.

The 25th NCB also landed during the assault on Guam as the shore party to the 3rd Marine Regiment, after which the 19th Marines were deactivated, and the 25th NCB was reassigned. The 62nd NCB was then posted TAD to the 3rd for Iwo Jima. They were in the reserve, but they became the lead battalion in getting airfield No. 1 operational, after of the many casualties taken by the primary assault Seabees, the 133rd NCB.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 32130233881

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell dress blue charlies usmc

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1135 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Just a thought
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Value but not for Hot Climates
Size: King, Style: All-Season
This is a fantastic, fluffy, thick duvet for the price. I really like it. Only issue is that it is definitely warm. I live in an area with hot summers, and we keep the AC around 73-74 overnight and this is way too hot for that. I had to replace it with something thinner. I love the feel of this duvet inside of my cover, it feels super nice, warm and cozy. It is just too hot. I will try it over the winter months, but it might just become a mat under my sheets to make the bed cozier. If you live somewhere with hot summers, this won't be the one for you for the hot months. It will be great for someone up north, or anywhere with mild evenings. Wish I could use it. Feels so cozy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 8, 2025
R
Verified Purchase
Renee
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Feels luxury, I approve
Size: King, Style: Warm
I have purchased high end comforters/duvet inserts and this one is somehow my favorite. It's so thick and fluffy. I was going to do the double duvet insert method to create an extra lush bed situation, but honestly it's not needed at all with this comforter! It poofs up wonderfully inside my duvet cover (king duvet, king insert) and it's like heaven. It's very cozy yet airy, and it moves well during the night and does not fee too heavy despite its weight. This thing is definitely on the warm end and probably won't be suitable for Florida summers, but depending on how you set the AC at night it could be fine! The comforter is weighty, it feels like quality, and has a soft fabric. I wouldn't use it without a duvet cover, that's more of an aesthetic choice but I like keeping it clean. The white is very white. Honestly, I will be getting another one simply because I'm so impressed. Definitely no need to drop $300+ dollars elsewhere.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 25, 2025
R
Verified Purchase
Ryan flores
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Great duvet insert
Size: King, Style: Light
Perfect duvet insert. I got a pretty expensive duvet to cover this and they worked great together. The fit was perfect and I didn’t feel like the duvet was smaller than its cover. This was a cheap option that keep us warm while not being too think. This product is also breathable and recommend if you live in a place that transitions from hot to cold often.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
Fun.Frugal.Mom.
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Price. Very comfortable and warm
Size: Full/Queen, Style: All-Season
I got this for a good price. It is warm, comfortable and washes well. It's a nice weight. I would buy this again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kingsize
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Buy this instead of the ‘brand name’ one
Size: Twin, Style: Warm
Tl:DR: Buy it, it’s super cheap, better than the one I paid 2x the price for and soft as it can get, and it really is a ‘Winter comforter’. This review is going to sound like I got paid off for it but I actually didn’t. I bought another comforter prior to this one, paid close to double of this one and that the ‘on sale’ price, and it is trash compared to this Amazon basics one. Both claim to be thick warm comforters but I can literally stack two of the other brand and maybe they’d be almost as thick as the Amazon one. I only bought this one because the other ‘winter’ one I bought was so thin and flimsy I figured adding another ‘cheapie’ one might make me not freeze to death. As soon as I arrived I noticed that this Amazon one was WAY thicker, nicer looking, softer and warmer than the old one. Just to try it out I stacked both of them together to see if I wouldn't freeze to death like I was doing with the old ‘expensive’ one: five minutes in and I was sweating. That’s all it took, I immediately removed the duvet cover from the old one, switched it to the Amazon one and threw the old one somewhere where I couldn’t see the money I had wasted, and yes the Amazon was warmer and softer even WITHOUT the duvet cover. I’m probably going to get the light version for when fall hits and I don’t quite need the heavy one yet. Buy it you won’t regret it and hey it’s Amazon brand so if you don’t like it they’ll take care of you, but I HIGHLY doubt you won’t love this thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026

recommand products